US Court Sentences Chinese National to Nearly 4 Years for $37M Crypto Fraud

By: crypto insight|2026/02/03 00:00:01
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways:

  • A Chinese national was sentenced to 46 months in federal prison for laundering nearly $37 million from U.S. victims via a crypto investment scam.
  • This scam utilized fake trading platforms that mimicked legitimate cryptocurrency exchanges.
  • The laundered funds were cleverly routed through the Bahamas before ending up in Cambodia.
  • Eight defendants have been sentenced so far, enhancing the DOJ’s efforts to combat crypto-related crimes.
  • The DOJ continues to escalate its campaign against international crypto fraud with significant convictions and asset recoveries.

WEEX Crypto News, 2026-02-02 15:30:18

In a significant stride toward curbing crypto-related fraud, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced the sentencing of a Chinese national for his pivotal role in laundering $37 million obtained through a convoluted crypto investment scam. Jingliang Su, renowned for orchestrating sophisticated fraud from Cambodian soil, was sentenced to 46 months in federal prison. This sentence, handed down by United States District Judge R. Gary Klausner, is yet another milestone in the relentless pursuit of justice for the victims, marking a new chapter in the DOJ’s expanding efforts to dismantle international scam operations.

Unveiling the Intricacies of Romance Scams and Deceptive Platforms

This fraudulent enterprise was no ordinary scam. It involved overseas conspirators who systematically targeted unsuspecting American victims via unsolicited social media messages, telephone calls, and even online dating services. The ambitious scam did not just stop at fake profiles or misleading interactions. Once trust was established, these victims were led into a web of deceit through fraudulent digital asset investments. To an unsuspecting eye, the platforms these scammers promoted appeared legitimate and professional. Fake websites were masterfully crafted to mimic well-known cryptocurrency trading platforms, tricking the victims into thinking they were engaging with authentic, lucrative crypto investments.

By cloaking their activities in the guise of bona fide trading platforms, the perpetrators made their victims believe their money was being invested wisely. Victims were manipulated into transferring funds to these counterfeit sites, where they were assured that their investments were growing—with fraudulent assurances that masked the grim reality that their money had already been siphoned away. Assistant Attorney General A. Tysen Duva emphasized the nefarious nature of this crime, noting the evolving strategies of criminals who have adapted to exploit technology in the digital age.

Tracing the Path of $37 Million Through International Waters

The meticulous orchestration of this scam was crucial for its success. Designed to obscure the illicit origins of the funds, the strategy involved siphoning off more than $36.9 million from victims’ bank accounts in the U.S. These funds did not follow a straightforward path. Instead, they made an intermediary stop at Deltec Bank in the Bahamas, a clever maneuver intended to muddy the waters and evade detection. Here, the stolen funds were transformed into the stablecoin Tether (USDT), a process that masked their origins further. Once converted, these funds were transferred to a digital wallet under stringent control in Cambodia, where the final phase of the distribution ensued.

Cambodian-based associates then handled the distribution of USDT, spreading it across various scam centers in the region. First Assistant United States Attorney Bill Essayli stressed the deceptive allure of new investment opportunities that lure unsuspecting individuals with promises of wealth, underscoring the critical necessity for vigilance and skepticism in the burgeoning investment landscape.

The Broader Crackdown and Sentencing of Conspirators

Jingliang Su, while a critical player in this grand scheme, was not alone. He was among eight conspirators apprehended by the authorities. Each conspirator played a vital role in this orchestrated crime operation. Su has been in federal custody since December 2024, reflective of the rigorous clampdowns catalyzed by the DOJ’s efforts. Co-conspirators Jose Somarriba and ShengSheng He have also faced justice, pleading guilty to conspiring to operate an unlicensed money transmitting business. Their sentences—36 months and 51 months in prison, respectively—further illustrate the legal ramifications faced by those embroiled in such fraudulent endeavors.

This wave of sentencing reflects the DOJ Criminal Division’s unwavering commitment to not only uncover but fully dismantle scam operations that exploit digital platforms to defraud unsuspecting victims worldwide. It serves as a testament to the evolving strategies in place to ensure justice is served, leveraging international cooperation when necessary to challenge and curb cybercrime at its roots.

DOJ’s Expanding Battle Against Crypto Crime

The sentencing of Jingliang Su and his conspirators come at a time when the DOJ is intensifying its enforcement actions against cryptocurrency-related criminal activities. This development coincides with another significant victory for the DOJ: the forfeiture of over $400 million in assets tied to Helix, a notorious darknet cryptocurrency mixer. This mixer facilitated the laundering of proceeds from illicit online marketplaces between 2014 and 2017, serving as a testament to the complex networks of crime that the DOJ seeks to dismantle.

Statistics from the DOJ Criminal Division Fraud Section’s 2025 Year in Review indicate a seismic rise in crypto crimes. Prosecutors have accused 265 defendants, leading to alleged fraud losses exceeding $16 billion—a stark increase from prior years. These figures underscore how cryptocurrency is increasingly leveraged as both a preferred method of payment and a mechanism for laundering illicit gains. To combat this threat, the DOJ is not acting in isolation but is capitalizing on a global network of International Computer Hacking and Intellectual Property prosecutors stationed worldwide to synchronize efforts with foreign law enforcement partners. Since 2020, this cooperative approach has wrought significant victories, yielding convictions for over 180 cybercriminals and court orders returning more than $350 million to victims.

The rise of cryptocurrency brings prospective investors untapped opportunities alongside potential perils. Narrating these judicial proceedings and technological advancements serves as a stark reminder of the vigilance needed to safeguard financial interests. As cryptocurrencies continue to gain traction, so too will the innovations of those seeking to exploit them illicitly. The DOJ’s ongoing vigilance and adaptability in this dynamic landscape demonstrate that while technology creates new possibilities for economic growth, it simultaneously inspires a new breed of criminality. However, the long arm of justice remains responsive and resolute, tracking its targets across the interconnected web of modern digital finance.

FAQs

What was Jingliang Su’s role in the crypto fraud scheme?

Jingliang Su played a crucial role in laundering nearly $37 million stolen through a complex cryptocurrency investment scam. Operating from Cambodia, he and his co-conspirators manipulated victims by using fake trading platforms to steal funds and then launder these through various financial channels.

How did the scheme deceive its victims?

The scheme targeted victims through social media and online dating services, offering fake cryptocurrency investment opportunities. These investments were executed via counterfeit trading platforms mimicking legitimate exchanges, deceiving victims into transferring their money to scammers who falsely promised high returns.

How were the laundered funds processed internationally?

Funds stolen from U.S. victims were moved to Deltec Bank in the Bahamas, converted into Tether (USDT), and transferred to a digital wallet in Cambodia. There, the USDT was distributed across different scam operations, effectively masking the funds’ illicit origins.

What actions is the DOJ taking to combat crypto crime?

The DOJ is intensifying efforts against crypto-related crimes, highlighted by recent successes such as the recovery of over $400 million tied to illicit activities on the darknet. They continue leveraging international cooperation to investigate and prosecute offenders, returning stolen assets to victims where possible.

How is cryptocurrency being used in criminal activities?

Cryptocurrency is increasingly seen as a vehicle for money laundering and fraud due its pseudo-anonymity and ease of transfer across borders. Criminals use digital currencies to obscure the origin of funds, complicating the task of tracking illegal activity.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more