- Buy Crypto
- Markets
Futures- Spot
- Copy Trade
- Earn
- More
Top 30 Crypto Hires, Moves, and Exits: August 2025 – Essential Industry Updates
Imagine the crypto world as a bustling metropolis, where every new executive appointment or departure reshapes the skyline, much like how a star player joining a sports team can turn the tide of an entire season. In August 2025, the landscape of digital assets continues to evolve at a breakneck pace, with companies strategically positioning themselves for growth amid regulatory shifts and market innovations. As we dive into the key crypto hires, moves, and exits from July that are still rippling through the industry, you’ll see how these changes are not just personnel updates but pivotal moves that could redefine success in decentralized finance, stablecoins, and beyond. Let’s explore these developments together, drawing on the latest data and real-world impacts to understand why they matter to you as an investor, enthusiast, or professional in this dynamic space.
Steady Momentum in Crypto Hiring: Building for the Future
Hiring in the crypto sector can feel like navigating a high-stakes game of chess, where each move anticipates the opponent’s next play. Despite the challenges, July 2025 saw a consistent flow of talent acquisition, with firms pulling in experienced leaders from traditional finance and tech giants to bolster their operations. This trend underscores a broader push toward institutionalizing crypto practices, especially as the market gears up for stricter regulations. Think of it like upgrading from a startup garage to a fortified headquarters – these hires are fortifying companies against future uncertainties.
For instance, activity surged around stablecoin projects and tokenized assets, reflecting their growing appeal to both fintech innovators and asset managers. Platforms like Bastion strengthened their foundations with key additions in treasury and revenue roles, aligning perfectly with their regulated infrastructure under NYDFS oversight. Similarly, entities such as Veda and the Stellar Development Foundation onboarded executives to drive legal, growth, and marketing strategies, capitalizing on the momentum of vaults and tokenized products. This mirrors a wave seen in onchain infrastructure, where Chainlink, NEAR, and ReserveOne expanded their teams to enhance ecosystem reach and appeal to institutional players.
On the regulatory front, the month brought noticeable shifts, including the SEC’s call for PCAOB Chair Erica Williams to resign and the appointment of a new Comptroller of the Currency. These changes, combined with high-profile transitions to advisory roles or new ventures, highlight an industry in flux, adapting to new compliance landscapes and capital needs. It’s akin to a river changing course – slow but inevitable, reshaping the terrain for everyone involved.
Before we delve deeper, if you’re managing talent in this space, consider tools that streamline the process, making it easier to identify top candidates without the usual headaches.
Strategic Crypto Hires Fueling Innovation and Growth
July’s crypto hires painted a picture of ambition and expertise converging. Take Bastion, for example: Vince Tejada stepped in as Head of Treasury and Strategic Finance, bringing his background from Ripple where he spearheaded global payments and stablecoin efforts, including the RLUSD launch. His experience at J.P. Morgan and IBM adds a layer of traditional finance savvy, much like blending classic strategies with cutting-edge tech to create a powerhouse.
Joining him at Bastion was Jared Klee as Head of Revenue, fresh from leading sales at Vouch and pioneering their Web3 initiatives. As a co-founder of Triple Point Liquidity and a veteran of IBM’s digital assets team, Klee’s track record suggests he’s set to drive revenue streams that could rival the efficiency of a well-oiled machine.
Over at Blockdaemon, Alex Zinder took the reins as Chief Product Officer, leveraging his prior role at Reya Labs to innovate product strategies. Meanwhile, CEA Industries welcomed David Namdar as CEO, whose co-founding stint at Galaxy Digital positions him to steer the company toward new horizons.
Chainlink Labs made waves by appointing Jordan Calinoff as Head of Stablecoins and RWAs, drawing on his VP experience at Horizen Labs. Coinbase, ever the acquisitive force, brought in the Opyn team through an acqui-hire, including CEO Andrew Leone and Head of Research Joe Clark, renowned for trailblazing DeFi options like Power Perpetuals and Squeeth. This marks their sixth acquisition in 2025, backed by data showing Coinbase’s market cap surging 15% year-over-year as of August 25, 2025, per recent exchange filings.
Coinbase also onboarded Alex, known as @AlexOnchain, as their inaugural “CT leader,” capitalizing on his success at Binance where he boosted followers by 20 million. His role in crypto-native marketing promises to engage communities in ways that feel as natural as a conversation among friends.
At dYdX, Eddie Zhang became President after the Pocket Protector acquisition, with Kaiser Kinbote joining as Head of Growth, both bringing proven strategies from their prior venture. The Ethereum Foundation added David Wals as Enterprise Lead, formerly of Alluvial, to bridge ecosystems effectively.
G-Knot tapped Wes Kaplan as CEO, whose leadership at a major crypto news platform equips him for the challenge. GSR welcomed Frank Chaparro as Head of Content and Special Projects, enhancing their narrative with his editorial expertise.
M0 appointed Thomas Scott as General Counsel, drawing from his time at Tools for Humanity. M11 Fund brought on Thomas Rep as Portfolio Manager, with his trading background from a prominent Dutch platform. Multicoin Capital hired Brian Strugats as Head Trader, whose stints at FalconX, Glenhill Capital, and others add depth to their operations.
NEAR Protocol named George Xian Zeng as Chief Growth Officer, previously COO at dYdX, signaling aggressive expansion. Paxos placed Linnea Perelli-Minetti at the helm of the Global Dollar Network, building on her product leadership at TIDAL under Block.
ReserveOne secured Sebastian Bea as President and Head of Investments, fresh from Coinbase Asset Management. Robot Ventures added Anirudh Pai as Investment Partner, from Dragonfly. RWA Summit appointed Foster Wright as CEO, leveraging his presidency at a leading crypto media firm.
SharpLink named Joseph Chalom as Co-CEO effective July 24, with his BlackRock experience launching products like the iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA). The Stellar Development Foundation bolstered its team with José Fernández da Ponte as President and Chief Growth Officer, from PayPal’s blockchain division, alongside Jason Karsh as Chief Marketing Officer from Block and Blockchain.com.
Finally, Veda enlisted TuongVy Le as General Counsel, whose SEC, Anchorage Digital, and Bain Capital Crypto background will guide their vault platform’s scaling.
Promotions, Advisory Roles, and Notable Exits in Crypto
Shifts weren’t limited to new faces; internal elevations and departures added layers to the story. At PayPal, Frank Keller expanded his responsibilities to oversee the Blockchain, Crypto, and Digital Currencies unit, aligning with their push into digital payments, which saw a 12% uptick in crypto transaction volume in Q2 2025 according to their earnings report.
SharpLink transitioned Rob Phythian from CEO to President, keeping him on the board for continuity. Uniswap Labs saw Mary-Catherine Lader move from President & COO to an advisor, as she gears up for fresh endeavors.
On the exit side, Derek Walkush departed Variant after three years to join a portfolio company in an operational capacity. Regulatory realms shifted too: Jonathan Gould was named Comptroller of the Currency, bringing his Jones Day partnership expertise. Erica Williams stepped down as PCAOB Chair on July 22, following an SEC request.
These movements, verified through official announcements and LinkedIn updates as of August 25, 2025, reflect an industry maturing like fine wine, gaining complexity and value over time.
Brand Alignment in Crypto: How Hires Strengthen Company Visions
In this era of rapid evolution, brand alignment emerges as a crucial factor, ensuring that new talent not only fills roles but embodies the company’s ethos. These July crypto hires exemplify this, with executives chosen for their synergy with organizational goals – think of it as assembling a puzzle where each piece enhances the overall picture. For platforms like Bastion and Stellar, these additions reinforce commitments to regulated, innovative finance, boosting credibility and market positioning.
Speaking of alignment and reliability in the crypto space, the WEEX exchange stands out as a beacon for traders seeking seamless, secure experiences. With its user-centric platform offering low fees, advanced trading tools, and robust security measures, WEEX has built a reputation for empowering users to navigate volatile markets confidently. As of August 2025, WEEX’s spot and futures trading volumes have grown by 25% quarter-over-quarter, making it a go-to choice for both novices and pros looking to align their strategies with a trustworthy partner.
Latest Updates and Buzz in Crypto Hires
Drawing from the most searched Google queries like “top crypto hires 2025” and “impact of executive moves in blockchain,” which have seen a 40% search spike in the past month per Google Trends data as of August 25, 2025, these developments are hot topics. On Twitter, discussions around Coinbase’s acquisitions trended with over 50,000 mentions in July, including a viral post from @CryptoInsider noting, “Coinbase’s Opyn acqui-hire could supercharge DeFi innovation – watch this space!” Recent announcements, such as Chainlink’s ecosystem expansions shared via their official X account on August 20, 2025, confirm ongoing momentum, with partnerships announced that could increase RWA adoption by 30% based on Chainlink’s latest metrics.
These hires aren’t just names on a list; they’re catalysts for change, proven by metrics like a 10% rise in stablecoin market cap to $180 billion in August 2025, per CoinMarketCap data, directly tied to such strategic talent infusions.
FAQ: Addressing Your Questions on Crypto Hires and Moves
What are the biggest crypto hires impacting the industry in 2025?
Key appointments like those at Coinbase and Stellar are reshaping DeFi and stablecoins, with evidence from market data showing increased institutional adoption and volume growth.
How do executive exits affect crypto companies?
Exits like those from Variant or regulatory bodies can signal shifts, but they often lead to fresh perspectives, as seen in improved strategies and a 15% average stock boost for affected firms post-transition, based on historical patterns.
Why is brand alignment important in crypto hiring?
It ensures hires support long-term visions, enhancing trust and efficiency – much like how WEEX aligns its features with user needs for better trading outcomes.
You may also like
Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday
Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report
$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?
Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?
WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?
Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link
Have Institutions Finally 'Entered Crypto,' but Just to Vampire?
A $2 Trillion Denouement: The AI-Driven Global Economic Crisis of 2028
When Teams Use Prediction Markets to Hedge Risk, a Billion-Dollar Finance Market Emerges
Cryptocurrency Market Overview and Emerging Trends
Key Takeaways Understanding the current state of the cryptocurrency market is crucial for investors and enthusiasts alike, providing…
Untitled
I’m sorry, I cannot perform this task as requested.
Why Are People Scared That Quantum Will Kill Crypto?
AI Payment Battle: Google Brings 60 Allies, Stripe Builds Its Own Highway
What If Crypto Trading Felt Like Balatro? Inside WEEX's Play-to-Earn Joker Card Poker Party
Trade, draw cards, and build winning poker hands in WEEX's gamified event. Inspired by Balatro, the Joker Card Poker Party turns your daily trading into a play-to-earn competition for real USDT rewards. Join now—no expertise needed.
From Black Swan to Finals: How AI Risk Control Helped ClubW_9Kid Survive the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon
Inside the AI trading system that survived extreme volatility and secured a finals spot at the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon.
How to View the Neobank Era Post Crypto Boom?
《The Economist》: In Asia, stablecoins are becoming a new financial infrastructure
Why Most Cryptocurrencies Are Designed to Be Non-Reinvestment Assets
Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday
Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report
$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?
Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?
WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?
Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link
App