Ripple Co-Founder Leads $40M Push Against California Wealth Tax

By: crypto insight|2026/02/03 00:00:01
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways

  • Ripple’s Chris Larsen and Tim Draper are spearheading a $40 million initiative, Grow California, to influence state politics against a wealth tax.
  • The proposed tax, backed by labor unions, targets billionaires’ net worth, potentially including unrealized gains.
  • The political effort seeks to elect moderate state legislators focusing on public safety, homelessness, and budgetary control.
  • As California faces political tension over crypto regulations, other regions have introduced clearer tax frameworks.

WEEX Crypto News, 2026-02-02 15:26:17

In an unexpected turn of events, Ripple co-founder Chris Larsen and renowned venture capitalist Tim Draper have embarked on a formidable political campaign dubbed Grow California. With a strong financial backing totaling $40 million, this initiative seeks to counter a controversial proposed wealth tax that has stirred Silicon Valley’s high-profile community into action. Fueled by the prospect of a one-time 5% tax on net worth exceeding $1 billion—particularly irking affluent individuals whose fortunes include unrealized gains—the debate encapsulates a wider challenge against union-backed legislative measures. This collective opposition is considered one of the largest monetary commitments emerging from the tech and crypto sectors aimed at reshaping California’s legislative landscape.

Tech Giants Move to Influence State Politics

The proposed wealth tax has undeniably acted as a catalyst for Larsen and Draper’s initiative. With each of them contributing $5 million initially, Grow California aims to support moderate candidates in state elections. For Larsen, whose personal net worth sits around $15 billion primarily due to his Ripple holdings and other cryptocurrency assets, this political endeavor marks a significant commitment—intending to invest as much as $30 million personally.

Larsen and Draper have strategically decided to focus their efforts on electing candidates across roughly a dozen state legislative seats. These efforts, spearheaded by Shaudi Fulp, a former Sacramento lobbyist, are designed to emphasize practical policies centered on public safety, addressing homelessness, and maintaining budget discipline. Despite Democrats holding a substantial majority in both legislative chambers, Grow California has made it clear it will refrain from engaging in the 2026 gubernatorial race or in costly ballot proposition campaigns.

Interestingly, though spearheaded by crypto industry figures, the initiative asserts its independence from representing narrow crypto-related interests. Lessons learned from past campaigning efforts, like those of Fairshake—a super PAC associated with Ripple that expended over $100 million shaping congressional outlooks—have evidently informed their current strategy.

New California Political Dynamics: Union Influence vs. Business Interests

The union-backed wealth tax proposal points to an ongoing struggle between business interests and labor union powers. This dynamic is far from a trivial local issue, especially given the far-reaching implications it holds for how California will leverage its tech and entrepreneurial potential.

According to Larsen, while he respects the tenacity of government unions, there’s a crucial need for balance. The new tax proposals, as articulated by crypto and tech leaders, could lead to widespread capital flight from the state—creating an exodus of high-net-worth residents well in advance of the 2026 ballot vote.

These developments are unfolding amid significant shifts in California’s regulatory environment. The contentious tax proposal coincides with former Assembly member Ian Calderon entering the 2026 gubernatorial race with a pronounced pro-Bitcoin platform. Aged just 39, Calderon has boldly advocated for California to assert itself as a definitive leader in Bitcoin adoption, aligning his vision with an increasingly digital financial future.

Meanwhile, current Governor Gavin Newsom’s actions have attracted attention. Newsom has been vociferous in his criticism of former President Donald Trump’s crypto-related pardons, launching a state-operated site spotlighting specific pardons he labels as controversial. Notable mentions include Binance founder Changpeng Zhao and Silk Road’s Ross Ulbricht, both of whom had their respective sentences commuted or pardoned.

State Regulatory Landscape Versus Global Tax Norms

On the heels of these political maneuvers, California is also advancing its digital asset infrastructure through pending laws. The Digital Financial Assets Law, which comes into effect in July 2025, mandates that all crypto service providers acquire state licenses. Comparable efforts include AB 1180, a law that allows for digital asset fee payments on a trial basis through 2031.

This backdrop of state-specific regulatory tension contrasts sharply with global approaches towards crypto taxation. For instance, Japan is poised to implement a tax reform by 2026, reducing crypto tax obligations from a potential 55% rate to a flat 20% on specified digital assets managed by registered businesses. In addition, the European Union’s DAC8 tax transparency law, effective as of January 1, systematically enforces crypto exchange and service provider reporting duties to facilitate cross-border data sharing among EU members.

Across the Pacific, South Korea continues to grapple with uncertainties tied to its delayed crypto tax regime, now anticipated in 2027 despite infrastructural gaps. Switzerland, traditionally a crypto-friendly nation, has similarly postponed the automated exchange of crypto account information with foreign authorities until at least 2027, though regulatory frameworks are slated to begin in January 2026.

Crypto’s Political and Economic Impact

California’s challenges represent a critical juncture that could either reaffirm its status as a pioneering tech hub or deter potential investors due to the proposed punitive measures. At its core, the Grow California movement and the wealth tax debate underscore the friction between economic innovation and equitable resource distribution—a classic conflict between rapidly evolving tech industries and government efforts to ensure fair wealth taxation.

The upcoming elections and legislative changes could significantly alter the balance of power between business and labor interests within the state. As Larsen and Draper mobilize their resources to support candidates who reflect their vision for California’s future, the outcome will not only influence state politics but will likely resonate with the tech and entrepreneurial communities worldwide.

In closing, as the lines between politics, technology, and finance grow increasingly intertwined, stakeholders at every level—from local communities to global investors—have much riding on the direction that California chooses to take. The stakes are indeed high, not merely economically but for the ideological direction of innovation within one of the world’s most influential economic landscapes.

FAQs

What is California’s proposed wealth tax and who does it target?

California’s proposed wealth tax aims to impose a one-time 5% levy on individuals with a net worth exceeding $1 billion. This tax, notably, includes unrealized gains, potentially impacting high-net-worth individuals connected to the cryptocurrency and technology sectors.

How are Chris Larsen and Tim Draper involved in political initiatives against the tax?

Chris Larsen, co-founder of Ripple, alongside venture capitalist Tim Draper, launched Grow California, a $40 million campaign meant to support moderate state legislators and challenge union-backed wealth tax proposals.

What impact could the proposed wealth tax have on California’s economy?

Critics argue that a wealth tax on unrealized gains could prompt capital flight and drive high-net-worth residents out of California, potentially stalling innovation and economic growth within the technology sector.

How are other regions globally handling crypto taxation?

Globally, regions such as Japan and the European Union have adopted clearer crypto taxation frameworks. For example, Japan is reducing its tax rate to a flat 20% by 2026, while the EU’s DAC8 establishes comprehensive information sharing requirements among member states.

Are there parallels between California’s crypto regulations and those elsewhere in the world?

California’s evolving approach, including new state licensing laws, is paralleled by global trends towards formalizing digital asset regulations, though inconsistencies remain. Comparably, South Korea and Switzerland face delays and ongoing adaptations in their regulatory agendas.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more