Behind the sky-high market value of $6 billion, Hyperliquid attempts to reshape the cryptocurrency listing landscape

By: blockbeats|2024/12/14 11:30:02
0
Share
copy

Recently, Hyperliquid's public listing mechanism has caused heated discussions. However, the reason why this matter can attract the attention of the market is inseparable from a Twitter post by Moonrock Capital CEO Simon on November 1 this year. He claimed that "Binance requires a potential project to provide 15% of its total token supply to ensure its listing on CEX, which accounts for 15% of the total token supply, worth about 50 million to 100 million US dollars."

At the same time, Sonic Labs co-founder Andre Cronje also posted that "Binance does not charge listing fees, but Coinbase has repeatedly requested fees and quoted 300 million US dollars, 50 million US dollars, 30 million US dollars, and the most recent quotation is 60 million US dollars."

Why is there always a dispute over listing fees?

In the Crypto world dominated by the spirit of decentralization, centralized CEX has become the main participant. However, it is difficult for the market to accept the black box operation of CEX listing. Every once in a while, there are "rumors" about CEX listing. He Yi, the founder of Binance, once said after listing PNUT and ACT that "no listing fees were charged". Even a strong company like Binance needs to get out of the whirlpool of public opinion about "listing fees" through the listing itself.

Behind the sky-high market value of $6 billion, Hyperliquid attempts to reshape the cryptocurrency listing landscape

He Yi's response to the controversy over listing fees

Despite this, it is still difficult for the market to be convinced that CEX has no listing fees. Even if there is no "open and aboveboard" charge, the remarks about invisible token fees are still coming one after another. Although some leading CEXs clearly list no listing fees in the announcement, the project party still needs to pay the corresponding margin to ensure that the coin price remains stable after listing. At the same time, the CEX's investment share and activity funds and other matters must be agreed with the CEX when listing the coin. These inexplicable invisible listing fees have also become the reason why the market concludes that CEX's listing is a "black box" operation.

On the one hand, such a cumbersome and opaque listing mechanism is an additional burden for the project party. The project party needs to spend extra costs to deal with CEX's listing affairs, which will lead to the problem of reverse screening. The project party has no intention of paying attention to long-term development, but will have the expectation of "good luck with listing", which ultimately leads to most of the projects listed on the exchange running away.

On the other hand, CEX's unfair listing has even evolved into a niche track. Researching listing has become a serious "business", and listing studies have become a compulsory course for many investors and KOLs. For example, Formula News made a huge profit of 3 million US dollars after ACT was listed through news transactions on listing.

Formula News conducts preemptive trading through coin listing announcement

It can be said that cryptocurrencies have suffered from centralization for a long time. The wealth effect of each coin listing is almost taken away by CEX (coin listing fees) and scientists (preemptive trading after coin listing). The project party will sacrifice the quality of the project because it has to bear a considerable coin listing fee. Everything is ultimately paid for by retail investors. The coin listing incident is exactly the same as the logic of retail investors embracing memecoin and rejecting VC coins today. The core is still inseparable from fairness.

HYPE has repeatedly set new highs. What is the market optimistic about?

However, the emergence of Hyperliquid broke the deadlock of "black box coin listing".

Hyperliquid's popularity in cryptocurrencies starts with HYPE's rise in service. It took only two weeks for HYPE to enter the top 50 in market capitalization after tge, surpassing new and old projects such as Fantom and Bittensor, and even Arbitrum itself. Although the narrative of Perp DEX is no longer a new narrative, Hyperliquid has successfully focused the market's attention on DEX again.

The listing mechanism that has contributed greatly

On December 12, HYPE broke through $18, setting a new record high. Behind the new high, on the one hand, it is inseparable from Hyperlqiuid's precise "market aesthetics", which keenly captured the market pulse of "VC to meme" in this cycle. As a project that looks like a "VC gathering temperament", Hyperliquid did not follow the old path of VC financing first, brushing the volume and then shipping on the exchange. Its founder Jeff has also publicly expressed his dissatisfaction with this form and market logic many times.

On the other hand, Hyperliquid's team operations and project development are also online. Hyperliquid's ambition is not limited to PerpDEX, and it is also actively building a "transaction" public chain characterized by low latency, high throughput, high-frequency transactions and order books. When the underlying logic is transformed from PerpDEX to a public chain, its valuation ceiling is also opened.

In addition to the above reasons, Hyperliquid's success is also due to its open and transparent listing mechanism. So how does Hyperliquid list its currency?

Dutch Auction

Hyperliquid uses a Dutch auction to auction the ticker of the token. Its listing process is also relatively open and transparent, and there is a detailed introduction in the official document.

First, if the project party wants to go online with spot, it needs to apply for the deployment permission of the HIP-1 native token (HIP-1 is the token standard established by Hyperliquid), and then the Dutch auction mechanism will be used to determine who will get the final token ticker. The Dutch auction is also called a descending price auction. The starting price of the auction will start at a price higher than the market expectation, and then the price will continue to decrease and the transaction will be completed when the first price is accepted. From the perspective of game theory, the Dutch auction reflects the true psychological expectations of the bidder and can achieve the auction at a fair price.

Hyperliquid deployment spot process

When the project party deploys the token on Hyperliquid, it needs to pay a gas fee, but this gas auction fee will be fed back to the HLP Vault in the future.

At the same time, Hyperliquid's auction is usually conducted every 31 hours, and there are a maximum of 282 spot listings throughout the year. This passive "limit" method also improves the quality of the online projects from the side.

In short, compared with the black box operation of CEX that makes the public scratch their heads, Hyperliquid's coin listing mechanism is open and transparent, and the gas auction price collected will be fed back to the community in the form of pledges to form a virtuous circle.

Auction mechanism derivative gameplay

With this open auction mechanism, there will be more interesting routes in the future. For example, this auction mechanism will also lead to "ticker" disputes. At the beginning of this year, when zkSync was listed on various major exchanges, Polyhedra Network, which initially used the ZK token ticker, gave the gold medal ticker ZK to zkSync, and then Polyhedra's token was changed to ZKJ.

It is foreseeable that more projects will have the same "fighting" behavior after they are launched on Hyperliquid in the future. Project parties will fight for a token ticker that is more suitable for them. Even in Web2, stories like "Sina spent 8 million yuan to buy weibo.com" and "Finance was bought by Moniker for 3.6 million US dollars in 2007" will soon be staged on Hyperlqiuid.

The "big loser" who spent $180,000

After Hyperliquid's tge and completed the "epic" airdrop, the auction price continued to break new highs. As early as around June this year, its auction ceiling had been hovering around $35,000, failing to break the previous hard cap of $35,000. However, after TGE, Hyperliquid received unprecedented market attention, and this time it was directly "pushed back" to $128,000, breaking through the previous shackles in one fell swoop. On December 11, it achieved a new historical high with a FARM auction of $180,000.

The last record-breaking $128,000 ticker battle originated from "SOLV". At the same time, it was noted that Solv Protocol will hold TGE in the near future, so it is very likely that this ticker was taken by Solv Protocol. Previously, the tickers auctioned by Hyperliquid were usually memes, such as PIP, CATBALL, etc.

After this airdrop, the popularity of Hyperlqiuid also began to soar. SOLV's record-breaking auction is a turning point for Hyperliquid to shift from a meme paradise to a regular onboard. Solv Protocol will also be the first top project to go online on Hyperlqiuid.

At the same time, Solv's login has brought a significant "catfish effect" to Hyperlqiud, which not only sets an example for Hyperliquid's subsequent ticker auctions, but also promotes the transaction structure to a more benign direction.

Hyperliquid Auction History

On the one hand, after Solv led the ticker auction market to break through the previous hard cap, the token tickers auctioned by Hyperliquid later also "got better". The market regards the SOLV auction as a reference for the post-TGE quotes. For example, tickers such as BUZZ and SHEEP have reached quotes of more than 100,000 US dollars, and the lowest HYFI was also sold at 90,000 US dollars. Subsequently, the FARM ticker on December 11th set a new record with 180,000 US dollars.

The final owner of FARM's token ticker is @thefarmdotfun . The Farm is building the world's first GenAI artificial intelligence agent game. Users can generate different types of pet-type AI agents through the GenAI model. When these AI pets are minted or traded, FARM tokens will be used for charging. Under the premise of a fixed total amount, 50% of FARM as a fee will be destroyed. FARM's $180,000 was not wasted. Within a few hours after the opening, the market value of $30 million was quickly passed, approaching $50 million. At the same time, it also opened up the imagination space of the Hyperliquid ecosystem again.

FARM’s market value at the opening on December 13 was close to 50 million US dollars

On the other hand, according to AXSN data, the daily trading volume of the token HYPE has already monopolized the daily trading volume of Hyperliquid, reaching a trading volume of 360 million US dollars, far ahead of tokens such as PURR, PIP, and JEFF. With the login of SOLV, the transaction structure of Hyperliquid will be further optimized. With the market attention and public opinion fermentation brought by the login of Solv Protocol, more project parties will choose to debut on Hyperliquid in the future, and the transaction volume will be more dispersed in the future.

Hyperliquid transaction structure distribution

What has Hyperliquid changed?

As Jeff, the founder of Hyperlqiuid, said, "ownership goes to the believers and doers, not rent-seeking insiders". The development of Hyperliquid is also in line with the two-way rush of the project party

For VC coins, listing Hyperlqiuid is also a complementary and mutually beneficial market behavior. The listing auction itself is also an advertisement. Solv has become the traffic center of market discussion because it won the auction ticker of Hyperliquid without paying additional advertising fees.

For many copycat project parties, even if some projects are listed on major exchanges, it is still difficult to stabilize the market. If they cannot be listed on the first-tier CEX during the bull market, it is basically difficult to maintain a good-looking "K line". Without liquidity, there is no traffic, and there is no subsequent story. Most unpopular tokens have become "high heels" or "Christmas trees" after listing.

It is difficult for many tokens to stabilize the market even if they are listed on major exchanges

Hyperlqiuid provides a more economical solution, which can not only meet the needs of the first major exchange for the time being, but also "grab a seat" on a good trading platform at a low cost. After the subsequent access to HyperEVM, the tokens purchased from Hyperliquid can be used in other EVMs, which further highlights its relative advantage in cost-effectiveness of listing. Although Hyperliquid does not have the strong listing effect of CEX at present, the SOLV auction event has received widespread market attention, which further highlights its status in the eyes of crypto people.

Hyperliquid's epic airdrop is more like a vigorous market education, allowing more people to know Perp DEX, understand, contact and use it; the transparent listing plan is the first shot in the anti-black box operation, resistance, struggle and victory.

From the perspective of the industry, the emergence of Hyperliquid is both a historical process and a choice of the times. Under the voice of the masses, the market has voted with its feet again and again for fairness. Hyperliquid's open listing mechanism is a revolution against the existing CEX black box operation of listing, forcing the entire industry to become more open and transparent.

What kind of entrepreneurial spirit does Crypto need?

Often the founder of a company determines the spiritual core of the company. This sentence is vividly illustrated on Hyperliquid.

Founder Jeff no longer trusts CEX after FTX went bankrupt, and does not accept any VC investment. In Jeff's eyes, most projects will first obtain investment platforms from top institutions, and then use various so-called points plans to embellish data, and finally complete the final exit by listing on large trading platforms. This industry model seems to have become the ultimate template for most project parties to rise to prominence: write stories, attract investment, and go to large exchanges. In the end, retail investors bear everything and usher in a mess. This kind of industry chaos that is eager for quick success and instant benefits is ultimately unsustainable.

Finally, Hyperliquid witnessed the victory of Jeff's decentralized spirit. The transparent and open mechanism and the strong cohesive community pushed PerpDEX to the climax of 2.0. Jeff can also proudly say: We did not distribute tokens to any private investors, centralized trading platforms, or market makers. The bullet fired many years ago hit him right in the eye.

The history of Crypto is also a history of decentralized struggle, from the birth of Bitcoin to the capitalization dispute of Neiro. No matter how Crypto changes, victory and justice will always stand on the side of the masses, on the side of fairness, and on the side of decentralization.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more